Opinion
No. 2D14–3054.
12-05-2014
Jack Edward Hill, pro se.
Jack Edward Hill, pro se.
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Hill v. State, 126 So.3d 1062 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) (table decision); Hill v. State, 97 So.3d 834 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) (table decision); Hill v. State, 80 So.3d 1031 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) (table decision); Doby v. State, 25 So.3d 598 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) ; Hughes v. State, 22 So.3d 132 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) ; Hill v. State, 967 So.2d 914 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007) (table decision); Hill v. State, 949 So.2d 1041 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007) (table decision); Hill v. State, 945 So.2d 515 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) (table decision); Bizzell v. State, 912 So.2d 386 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) ; Shortridge v. State, 884 So.2d 321 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) ; Harris v. State, 777 So.2d 994 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).
MORRIS, BLACK, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.