Opinion
No. 59646.
12-20-2011
Charles H. HILL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Nevada, Respondent.
Charles H. Hill Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney
Charles H. Hill
Attorney General/Carson City
Clark County District Attorney
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is a proper person appeal from an order denying “request to prove extreme detriment.” Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Jessie Elizabeth Walsh, Judge.
Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from an order denying the aforementioned request, we lack jurisdiction. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, we
It appears that appellant sought to challenge the validity of his judgment of conviction and sentence. Such a challenge must be raised in a post-conviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed in the district court in the first instance. NRS 34.724(2)(b) ; NRS 34.738(1). We express no opinion as to whether appellant can satisfy the procedural requirements of NRS chapter 34.
--------
ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.