From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hill v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Dec 11, 2012
387 S.W.3d 406 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)

Opinion

No. ED 98017.

2012-12-11

Michael HILL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Robert H. Dierker, Jr., Judge. Timothy J. Forneris, St. Louis, MO, for appellant. Chris Koster, Daniel N. McPherson, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.


Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Robert H. Dierker, Jr., Judge.


Timothy J. Forneris, St. Louis, MO, for appellant. Chris Koster, Daniel N. McPherson, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J., ROY L. RICHTER, J., and ANGELA T. QUIGLESS, J.

ORDER


PER CURIAM.

Michael Hill (“Movant”) appeals from the motion court's denial of his Rule 24.035 motion seeking to vacate his guilty plea and sentence for trafficking in the second degree, in violation of Section 195.223, RSMo Cum.Supp.2001, based on his plea counsel's ineffectiveness.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The judgment dismissing Movant's motion is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Hill v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Dec 11, 2012
387 S.W.3d 406 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)
Case details for

Hill v. State

Case Details

Full title:Michael HILL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.

Date published: Dec 11, 2012

Citations

387 S.W.3d 406 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)