Hill v. State

1 Citing case

  1. Stroud v. State

    335 S.E.2d 678 (Ga. Ct. App. 1985)   Cited 3 times

    ]" Hunt v. State, 173 Ga. App. 638, 639 ( 327 S.E.2d 500) (1985). A trial judge's determination that an applicant for a continuance has not met his burden of showing due diligence will not be reversed absent a clear abuse of discretion. Hill v. State, 169 Ga. App. 940, 941 ( 315 S.E.2d 480) (1984). No such clear abuse has been shown in the case at bar.