From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hill v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Oct 12, 1982
641 S.W.2d 194 (Mo. Ct. App. 1982)

Opinion

No. 45542.

October 12, 1982.

APPEAL FROM THE ST. LOUIS COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, ARTHUR LITZ, J.

Edward L. Adelman, Clayton, for appellant.

John Ashcroft, Atty. Gen., Kristie Green, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, George Westfall, Pros. Atty., Clayton, for respondent.


Movant-defendant James Roy Hill was found guilty on numerous counts of murder, robbery and felonious assault. Affirmed on appeal; State v. Hill, 539 S.W.2d 521 (Mo.App. 1976).

Defendant now seeks Rule 27.26 relief. He briefs two grounds: Counsel was ineffective in failing to move to quash the indictment on the ground of under-representation of blacks on the grand jury, and that the trial court allowed an excessive number of security guards in the courtroom.

The motion court summarily denied relief. The racial jury contention is squarely refuted by the trial record. Trial counsel did file a motion to quash the indictment on the alleged ground of excluding blacks from the grand jury; after an evidentiary hearing that motion was denied by the trial court. The record refutes defendant's basic ground for relief.

Further, defendant's contention of racial discrimination in St. Louis County's grand jury selection was refuted in State v. Garrett, 627 S.W.2d 635 (Mo.banc 1982).

Defendant's other point is that the trial jury was prejudiced by the excessive presence of security guards. This alleged error was a trial error; Milentz v. State, 545 S.W.2d 688 (Mo.App. 1976), and hence is not reviewable under Rule 27.26, Sweazea v. State, 588 S.W.2d 244 (Mo.App. 1979).

Affirmed.

REINHARD, P.J., and SNYDER and CRIST, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hill v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Oct 12, 1982
641 S.W.2d 194 (Mo. Ct. App. 1982)
Case details for

Hill v. State

Case Details

Full title:JAMES ROY HILL, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three

Date published: Oct 12, 1982

Citations

641 S.W.2d 194 (Mo. Ct. App. 1982)

Citing Cases

Watkins v. State

Trial errors are not cognizable in a proceeding under Rule 27.26. State v. Macon, 403 S.W.2d 630, 631[2] (Mo.…

Grady v. State

Obviously proof of forgery does not require proof of credit card fraud and should not be instructed as such.…