From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hill v. Rectenwald

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Pine Bluff Division
Nov 14, 2010
5:10-cv-00030-JMM-JTK (E.D. Ark. Nov. 14, 2010)

Opinion

5:10-cv-00030-JMM-JTK.

November 14, 2010


ORDER


The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. After a review of those proposed findings and recommendations, and the timely objections received thereto, as well as a de novo review of the record, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly,

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 112) is hereby DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 14th day of November, 2010.


Summaries of

Hill v. Rectenwald

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Pine Bluff Division
Nov 14, 2010
5:10-cv-00030-JMM-JTK (E.D. Ark. Nov. 14, 2010)
Case details for

Hill v. Rectenwald

Case Details

Full title:JESSIE HILL, ADC #104136 PLAINTIFF v. ROBERT RECTENWALD, et al. DEFENDANTS

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Pine Bluff Division

Date published: Nov 14, 2010

Citations

5:10-cv-00030-JMM-JTK (E.D. Ark. Nov. 14, 2010)