Opinion
2:20-cv-00684-APG-NJK 2:20-cv-01569-RFB-NJK 2:20- cv-01608-KJD-EJY 2:20- cv-01655-KJD-DJA 2:20- cv-01686-JAD-DJA 2:20- cv-01687-RFB-EJY 2:20- cv-01717-JAD-DJA 2:20- cv-01807-GMN-DJA 2:20- cv-01822-RFB-VCF 2:20- cv-01868-JAD-VCF 2:20- cv-02361-JAD-DJA 2:21- cv-00145-GMN-DJA 2:21- cv-00240-RFB-DJA 2:21- cv-00997-RFB-DJA 2:21- cv-01002-GMN-DJA 2:21- cv-01020-GMN-NJK 2:21- cv-01027-GMN-NJK 2:21- cv-01061-RFB-DJA 2:21- cv-01103-GMN-DJA 2:21- cv-01361-APG-DJA 2:21- cv-01362-APG-VCF 2:21- cv-01371-APG-EJY 2:21- cv-01375-GMN-VCF 2:21- cv-01516-APG-DJA 2:21- cv-01677-APG-BNW 2:21- cv-01679-JAD-DJA 2:21- cv-01698-APG-BNW 2:21- cv-01700-RFB-BNW 2:21- cv-0174LJAD-EJY 2:21- cv-01760-JAD-EJY 2:21- cv-01821-GMN-NJK 2:21- cv-01878-GMN-NJK 2:21- cv-01888-GMN-NJK 2:21- cv-01922-RFB-DJA 2:21- cv-01924-APG-VCF 3:20- cv-00495-ART-CSD 3:20- cv-00548-RFB-CSD
12-21-2022
Ricky Lee Hill, Plaitiff In Pro Per AARON D. FORD Attorney General D. Randall Gilmer, NV Bar No. 14001 Chief Deputy Attorney General Douglas R. Rands, NV Bar No. 3572 Senior Deputy Attorney General Leo T. Hendges, NV Bar No. 16034 Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for Defendants
Ricky Lee Hill, Plaitiff In Pro Per
AARON D. FORD Attorney General D. Randall Gilmer, NV Bar No. 14001 Chief Deputy Attorney General Douglas R. Rands, NV Bar No. 3572 Senior Deputy Attorney General Leo T. Hendges, NV Bar No. 16034 Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for Defendants
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and through the parties, RICKY LEE HILL, and D. Randall Gilmer, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Douglas R. Rands, Senior Deputy Attorney General, and Leo T. Hendges, Deputy Attorney General, on behalf of Defendants in each of the above-referenced cases, all of whom are current or former employees of the Nevada Department of Corrections or, in one instance, an employee of the Office of the Attorney General, and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), that each of case numbers referenced above and attached as Exhibit A hereto, shall be dismissed with prejudice, with each party bearing their own attorney's fees and costs.
The Parties, by mutual agreement, have resolved this matter in its entirety and agree that the Court may accordingly close the case, with prejudice. Any outstanding deadlines are considered moot.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED. This matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and the Clerk is directed to close the case.
Index of Exhibits Omitted