From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hill v. Rader

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Jun 18, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-173-BAJ-SCR (M.D. La. Jun. 18, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-173-BAJ-SCR

06-18-2012

GLENN HILL (#133059) v. STEVE RADER, ET AL.


RULING AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The Court has carefully considered the petition, the record, the law applicable to this action, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Steven C. Riedlinger dated May 17, 2012 (doc. no. 6). The plaintiff has filed an objection which merely restates his prior argument and has been duly considered.

The Court hereby approves the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge and adopts it as the Court's opinion herein. Accordingly, the plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) and with prejudice to refiling the complaint in forma pauperis.

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, this 18 day of June, 2012.

___________

BRIAN A. JACKSON, CHIEF JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA


Summaries of

Hill v. Rader

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Jun 18, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-173-BAJ-SCR (M.D. La. Jun. 18, 2012)
Case details for

Hill v. Rader

Case Details

Full title:GLENN HILL (#133059) v. STEVE RADER, ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Jun 18, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-173-BAJ-SCR (M.D. La. Jun. 18, 2012)