Opinion
Argued February 6, 1873
Decided February 11, 1873
Samuel Hand for the appellant.
E.G. Lapham for the respondent.
Per CURIAM opinion for affirmance.
All concur, except CHURCH, Ch. J., not voting.
Judgment affirmed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Hill v. Priestly
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 11, 1873
52 N.Y. 635 (N.Y. 1873)
Summaries of
Hill v. Priestly
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 11, 1873
52 N.Y. 635 (N.Y. 1873)
Case details for
Hill v. Priestly
Case Details
Full title:JEROME HILL, Appellant, v . ISAAC PRIESTLY, Respondent
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Feb 11, 1873
Citations
52 N.Y. 635 (N.Y. 1873)
Citing Cases
Pellissier v. Corker
The deed from Winbigler to Rhinehart did not create a valid limitation upon the use of the property,…
Maloney v. Iroquois Brewing Co.He had his remedy at law for its breach, or he could come into a court of equity, as he has done, and ask…