From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hill v. Patrick

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 5, 2007
Civil Action No. 05-445J (W.D. Pa. Mar. 5, 2007)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 05-445J.

March 5, 2007


ORDER


AND NOW, this 2Nd day of March, 2007, after the plaintiff, William A. Hill, filed an action in the above-captioned case, and Motions to Dismiss the Amended Complaint were filed by Defendants Dr. Jeanann McAllister and Department of Corrections, and after a Report and Recommendation was filed by the United States Magistrate Judge granting the parties ten days after being served with a copy to file written objections thereto, and no objections having been filed, and upon independent review of the motions and the record, and upon consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, which is adopted as the opinion of this Court,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Dr. Jeanann McAllister's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 58) is granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Department of Corrections ("DOC") Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 61) is granted in part and denied in part. It is granted as to all claims against all DOC Defendants except it is denied as to Plaintiff's First Amendment retaliation claim against Defendants Kechisen, Barber and Sawtelle and it is denied as to Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claim against Defendants Garman and Rice for their alleged failure to protect.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all of the claims against all of the Parole Defendants are dismissed pursuant to the screening provisions of the Prison Litigation Reform Act (" PLRA").

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, if the plaintiff desires to appeal from this Order he must do so within thirty (30) days by filing a notice of appeal as provided in Rule 3, Fed.R.App.P.


Summaries of

Hill v. Patrick

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 5, 2007
Civil Action No. 05-445J (W.D. Pa. Mar. 5, 2007)
Case details for

Hill v. Patrick

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM A. HILL, Plaintiff v. GEORGE PATRICK; ED KECHISEN; MARY JO BARBER…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 5, 2007

Citations

Civil Action No. 05-445J (W.D. Pa. Mar. 5, 2007)

Citing Cases

Stevens v. Schultz

There is no Sixth Amendment right of confrontation in the context of parole proceedings. See, e.g.,Hill v.…