From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hill v. Ogrodnik

Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Jun 3, 1955
114 A.2d 398 (R.I. 1955)

Opinion

Eq. No. 2312.

June 3, 1955, Decided

James L. Taft, Providence, for complainants.

John Quattrocchi, Jr., Providence, for respondents.


PER CURIAM.

After our decision in the above cause, 113 A.2d 734, the complainants asked for and received permission to file a motion for reargument. The motion sets out certain testimony to the effect that the removal of the deed restriction would not "seriously affect" the value of the Clauberg property. It was and is our judgment that such indefinite testimony should not be conclusive, since the cause was tried on an entirely different theory which is fully set forth in our opinion.

Motion denied.


Summaries of

Hill v. Ogrodnik

Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Jun 3, 1955
114 A.2d 398 (R.I. 1955)
Case details for

Hill v. Ogrodnik

Case Details

Full title:Charles G. HILL et al. v. Raymond F. OGRODNIK et al

Court:Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Date published: Jun 3, 1955

Citations

114 A.2d 398 (R.I. 1955)
1955 R.I. LEXIS 101