From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hill v. Newsom

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 9, 2021
2:19-cv-1680 JAM AC P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 9, 2021)

Opinion

2:19-cv-1680 JAM AC P

08-09-2021

NATHAN HILL, Plaintiff, v. GAVIN NEWSOM, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE.

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On July 19, 2021, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 39. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations issued July 19, 2021(ECF No. 39), are ADOPTED in full, and
2. Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction (ECF No. 38) is DENIED.


Summaries of

Hill v. Newsom

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 9, 2021
2:19-cv-1680 JAM AC P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 9, 2021)
Case details for

Hill v. Newsom

Case Details

Full title:NATHAN HILL, Plaintiff, v. GAVIN NEWSOM, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Aug 9, 2021

Citations

2:19-cv-1680 JAM AC P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 9, 2021)