From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hill v. Newsom

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 23, 2022
2:19-cv-1680 DAD AC P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 23, 2022)

Opinion

2:19-cv-1680 DAD AC P

11-23-2022

NATHAN HILL, Plaintiff, v. GAVIN NEWSOM, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

ALLISON CLAIRE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff has filed a motion for an extension of time to file objections to the court's findings and recommendations order issued November 4, 2022. ECF No. 55. In support of the motion, he states that he is currently being denied access to all his property, including his legal papers. Id. He anticipates that it will take an additional two weeks for him to receive his property. Id. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time (ECF No. 55) is GRANTED, and

2. Within thirty days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall file objections to the court's findings and recommendations order issued November 4, 2022.


Summaries of

Hill v. Newsom

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 23, 2022
2:19-cv-1680 DAD AC P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 23, 2022)
Case details for

Hill v. Newsom

Case Details

Full title:NATHAN HILL, Plaintiff, v. GAVIN NEWSOM, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Nov 23, 2022

Citations

2:19-cv-1680 DAD AC P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 23, 2022)