From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hill v. Mullin

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Feb 1, 2010
Case No. CIV-09-1003-F (W.D. Okla. Feb. 1, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. CIV-09-1003-F.

February 1, 2010


ORDER


This action is filed by petitioner seeking habeas relief. On December 30, 2009, Magistrate Judge Robert E. Bacharach filed a Report and Recommendation (doc. no. 16) recommending that respondent's motion to dismiss (doc. no. 10) be granted on grounds of timeliness. The Report advised petitioner that failure to timely object to the Report forecloses appellate review of the suggested ruling contained in the Report. Petitioner has not responded to the Report and has not asked for an extension of time within which to respond. With no objection having been filed, the court, after review, hereby ADOPTS, ACCEPTS and AFFIRMS the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, the motion to dismiss is GRANTED and this action is DISMISSED as untimely.


Summaries of

Hill v. Mullin

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Feb 1, 2010
Case No. CIV-09-1003-F (W.D. Okla. Feb. 1, 2010)
Case details for

Hill v. Mullin

Case Details

Full title:JEREMIAH RAMON HILL, Petitioner, v. MIKE MULLIN, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Date published: Feb 1, 2010

Citations

Case No. CIV-09-1003-F (W.D. Okla. Feb. 1, 2010)

Citing Cases

Washington v. Warden, Lebanon Corr. Inst.

But see Dunker v. Bissonnette, 154 F. Supp.2d 95, 105 (D. Mass. 2001) (rejecting argument that the…

Snead v. Warden

But see Dunker v. Bissonnette, 154 F. Supp.2d 95, 105 (D. Mass. 2001) (rejecting argument that the…