From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hill v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd.

United States Court of Appeals for the federal Circuit
May 22, 2012
2012-3093 (Fed. Cir. May. 22, 2012)

Opinion

2012-3093

05-22-2012

REGINALD HILL, Petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD Respondent.


NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.


Petition for Review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in case no. AT1221110409-W-1.

ON MOTION


ORDER

The Department of Veterans Affairs moves to recaption to designate the Merit Systems Protection Board (Board) as the respondent.

Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 7703(a)(2), the Board is designated as the respondent when the Board's decision concerns the procedure or jurisdiction of the Board. The employing agency is designated as the respondent when the Board reaches the merits of the underlying case. Here, the Board dismissed Hill's petition for lack of jurisdiction.

Thus, the Board is the proper respondent in this petition for review.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The motion is granted. The revised official caption is reflected above. The Board's responsive brief is due within 21 days of the date of filing of this order.

FOR THE COURT

______________

Jan Horbaly

Clerk
cc: Reginald Hill

Armando Rodriguez-Feo, Esq.

Calvin Morrow, Esq. (informal brief enclosed)
s25


Summaries of

Hill v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd.

United States Court of Appeals for the federal Circuit
May 22, 2012
2012-3093 (Fed. Cir. May. 22, 2012)
Case details for

Hill v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd.

Case Details

Full title:REGINALD HILL, Petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD Respondent.

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the federal Circuit

Date published: May 22, 2012

Citations

2012-3093 (Fed. Cir. May. 22, 2012)