From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hill v. Mc Grady

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Jul 29, 2009
CIVIL ACTION No 08-5476 (E.D. Pa. Jul. 29, 2009)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION No 08-5476.

July 29, 2009


ORDER


AND NOW, this 29th day of July 2009, upon consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. Nos. 1, 2), Respondent's Response in opposition thereto (Doc. No. 8), Petitioner's Reply (Doc. No. 9), the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Lynne A. Sitarski (Doc. No. 10), and Petitioner's Written Objections thereto (Doc. No. 11, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED AND ADOPTED;
2. The Petition for Writ of habeas Corpus is DENIED AND DISMISSED;
3. A certificate of appealability SHALL NOT issue because the Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right and because reasonable jurists would not find the correctness of the procedural aspects of this decision debatable. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); and
4. The Clerk of Court shall mark this case CLOSED for statistical purposes.


Summaries of

Hill v. Mc Grady

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Jul 29, 2009
CIVIL ACTION No 08-5476 (E.D. Pa. Jul. 29, 2009)
Case details for

Hill v. Mc Grady

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM HILL v. JAMES Mc GRADY Commissioner of Social Security

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jul 29, 2009

Citations

CIVIL ACTION No 08-5476 (E.D. Pa. Jul. 29, 2009)