From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hill v. Lowe

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 1, 2006
CIV F 05-1299 AWI DLB (E.D. Cal. Feb. 1, 2006)

Opinion

CIV F 05-1299 AWI DLB.

February 1, 2006


ORDER VACATING FEBRUARY 13, 2006, HEARING DATE AND TAKING DEFENDANTS'S MOTION TO DISMISS UNDER SUBMISSION


Defendants have noticed for hearing and decision a motion to dismiss. The matter was scheduled for hearing to be held on February 13, 2006. Pursuant to Local Rule 78-230(c), Plaintiff was required to file either an opposition or a notice of non-opposition no later than January 30, 2006. Plaintiff has not done so.

Due to Plaintiff's failure to file a timely opposition or notice of non-opposition, she is in violation of the Local Rules.See Local Rule 78-230(c). Plaintiff is further not entitled to be heard at oral argument in opposition to the motion. Id. The court has reviewed Defendants's motion and the applicable law, and has determined that the motion is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Local Rule 78-230(h).

Therefore, IT IS HERBY ORDERED that the previously set hearing date of February 13, 2006, is VACATED, and no party shall appear at that time. As of February 13, 2006, the court will take the matter under submission, and will thereafter issue its decision.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hill v. Lowe

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 1, 2006
CIV F 05-1299 AWI DLB (E.D. Cal. Feb. 1, 2006)
Case details for

Hill v. Lowe

Case Details

Full title:BONITA HEARN HILL, Plaintiff, v. JAMES LOWE, MONICA STEVENS, CATHY…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 1, 2006

Citations

CIV F 05-1299 AWI DLB (E.D. Cal. Feb. 1, 2006)