From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hill v. Lappin

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Jun 2, 2021
Civil Action 3:11-CV-1609 (M.D. Pa. Jun. 2, 2021)

Opinion

Civil Action 3:11-CV-1609

06-02-2021

DAVID E. HILL, Plaintiff v. HARLEY LAPPIN, et al., Defendants


ORDER

CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

AND NOW, this 2nd day of June, 2021, upon consideration of the motion (Doc. 341) for summary judgment by defendants Bledsoe, Hepner, Saylor, Edinger, and Carrasquillo, and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The motion (Doc. 341) for summary judgment is GRANTED.
2. The Clerk of Court is directed to ENTER judgment in favor of defendants B. Bledsoe, P. Carrasquilla, M. Edinger, J. Hepner, and M. Saylor, and against plaintiff David E. Hill.
3. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.


Summaries of

Hill v. Lappin

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Jun 2, 2021
Civil Action 3:11-CV-1609 (M.D. Pa. Jun. 2, 2021)
Case details for

Hill v. Lappin

Case Details

Full title:DAVID E. HILL, Plaintiff v. HARLEY LAPPIN, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania

Date published: Jun 2, 2021

Citations

Civil Action 3:11-CV-1609 (M.D. Pa. Jun. 2, 2021)