From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hill v. Kauffman

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Sep 29, 2021
Civil Action 21-389 (E.D. Pa. Sep. 29, 2021)

Opinion

Civil Action 21-389

09-29-2021

SYEEN HILL, Petitioner, v. SUPERINTENDENT KEVIN KAUFFMAN, et al., Respondents.


ORDER

BERLE M. SCHILLER, J.

AND NOW, this 29th day of September, 2021, upon careful and independent consideration of the petition, memorandum in support, response, and available state court records, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge David R. Strawbridge, it is ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;

2. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED AND DISMISSED;

3. A certificate of appealability SHALL NOT issue, in that the Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right nor demonstrated that reasonable jurists would debate the correctness of the procedural aspects of this ruling. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); and

4. The Clerk of the Court shall mark this case CLOSED for statistical purposes.


Summaries of

Hill v. Kauffman

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Sep 29, 2021
Civil Action 21-389 (E.D. Pa. Sep. 29, 2021)
Case details for

Hill v. Kauffman

Case Details

Full title:SYEEN HILL, Petitioner, v. SUPERINTENDENT KEVIN KAUFFMAN, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Sep 29, 2021

Citations

Civil Action 21-389 (E.D. Pa. Sep. 29, 2021)

Citing Cases

United States v. Gerald

“Courts have held that ‘a lockdown and limited library access alone do not support a finding that the statute…