From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hill v. Intown Suites Mgmt. Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION
Jun 6, 2014
Case No. 4:13CV1827 CDP (E.D. Mo. Jun. 6, 2014)

Opinion

Case No. 4:13CV1827 CDP

06-06-2014

DONALD T. HILL, Plaintiff, v. INTOWN SUITES MANAGEMENT INC., Defendant.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Donald Hill brought suit for personal injuries against defendant Intown Suites Management, Inc. A Suggestion of Death has now been filed indicating that Mr. Hill, has died in an unrelated automobile accident. A Motion for Substitution of Parties has also been filed on plaintiff's behalf, seeking the substitution of plaintiff's wife, Josephine Hill, as a plaintiff ad litem.

Under Missouri law, a cause of action for personal injuries not resulting in death does not abate by reason of the party's death, but instead survives to the personal representative of the injured party. R.S. Mo. § 537.020.1(1); State ex rel. Cunningham v. Wiggins, 156 S.W.3d 473, 476 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005). "Personal representative," as used in the statute, is that person to whom letters testamentary or letters of administration have been issued in a probate estate. Cunningham, 156 S.W.3d at 476 (citations omitted).

In contrast, Section 537.021.1(1) of the Missouri Revised Statutes authorizes an ad litem appointment to maintain a decedent's action instead of the personal representative, "but only for the purpose of pursuing a cause of action for lost chance of recovery or survival." Cunningham, 156 S.W.3d at 476.

Plaintiff's complaint includes no count for lost chance of recovery or survival. As such, substitution as a plaintiff ad litem is inappropriate, and if the case is to continue, plaintiff must have a personal representative appointed by the state court. Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for substitution of parties [# 33] is denied.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the deadlines in the Case Management Order and the Order Referring Case to Alternative Dispute Resolution are vacated, pending further order of the court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's counsel must file a proper motion to substitute, or a status report indicating when such a motion will be filed, no later than July 15, 2014. Once a proper party is substituted, the court will issue a new scheduling order.

__________

CATHERINE D. PERRY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Hill v. Intown Suites Mgmt. Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION
Jun 6, 2014
Case No. 4:13CV1827 CDP (E.D. Mo. Jun. 6, 2014)
Case details for

Hill v. Intown Suites Mgmt. Inc.

Case Details

Full title:DONALD T. HILL, Plaintiff, v. INTOWN SUITES MANAGEMENT INC., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Jun 6, 2014

Citations

Case No. 4:13CV1827 CDP (E.D. Mo. Jun. 6, 2014)