From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hill v. Green

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 1, 2021
2:21-CV-2077-WBS-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 1, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-CV-2077-WBS-DMC-P

12-01-2021

CYMEYON V. HILL, Plaintiff, v. GREEN, Defendant.


ORDER

DENNIS M. COTA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's motion, ECF No. 7, for leave to proceed in forma pauperis.

Plaintiff has not submitted a declaration that makes the showing of indigency required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). In particular, a review of Plaintiff's inmate trust account statement, ECF No. 9, reflects that Plaintiff has $3,934.17 in available funds, which is sufficient to pre-pay the filing fees for this case.

Based on the foregoing, the undersigned recommends that Plaintiffs motion, ECF No. 7, for leave to proceed in forma pauperis be denied and that this action be dismissed without prejudice to refiling upon pre-payments of the filing fees therefor.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the Court. Responses to objections shall be filed within 14 days after service of objections. Failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal. See Martinez v. Ylst 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).


Summaries of

Hill v. Green

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 1, 2021
2:21-CV-2077-WBS-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 1, 2021)
Case details for

Hill v. Green

Case Details

Full title:CYMEYON V. HILL, Plaintiff, v. GREEN, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Dec 1, 2021

Citations

2:21-CV-2077-WBS-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 1, 2021)