From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hill v. Gibson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 13, 2012
No. CIV S-12-0595 EFB P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 13, 2012)

Opinion

No. CIV S-12-0595 EFB P

03-13-2012

CARL E. HILL, Petitioner, v. CONNIE GIBSON, Respondent.


ORDER

Petitioner is a state prisoner without counsel seeking a writ of habeas corpus. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He has requested that the court appoint counsel. There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d 453, 460 (9th Cir. 1996). The court may appoint counsel at any stage of the proceedings "if the interests of justice so require." See 18 U.S.C. § 3006A; see also, Rule 8(c), Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. The court does not find that the interests of justice would be served by the appointment of counsel at this stage of the proceedings.

Accordingly, it hereby is ORDERED that petitioner's March 8, 2012 motion for appointment of counsel is denied without prejudice.

______________________

EDMUND F. BRENNAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Hill v. Gibson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 13, 2012
No. CIV S-12-0595 EFB P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 13, 2012)
Case details for

Hill v. Gibson

Case Details

Full title:CARL E. HILL, Petitioner, v. CONNIE GIBSON, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 13, 2012

Citations

No. CIV S-12-0595 EFB P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 13, 2012)