From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hill v. Edwards

Supreme Court of Connecticut Third Judicial District, Bridgeport, April Term, 1927
Jun 6, 1927
137 A. 915 (Conn. 1927)

Opinion

Argued April 22d 1927

Decided June 6th, 1927.

ACTION by the plaintiff, Ebenezer Hill, upon a promissory note, and action of replevin by the plaintiff, Mildred Ogden Hill, brought to the Superior Court in Fairfield County and tried to the court, Banks, J.; judgment for the plaintiff in the replevin action to retain possession of the specified articles of property, and for the plaintiff in the action on the promissory note to recover $6,000 damages, and appeals by defendant. No error.

John Keogh, for the appellant (defendant).

Joseph R. Swan of New York City and James E. Brinckerhoff, for the appellees (plaintiffs).


The questions arising on the corrections of the finding must be determined in favor of the plaintiff in each case. This conclusion disposes of the appeals.


Summaries of

Hill v. Edwards

Supreme Court of Connecticut Third Judicial District, Bridgeport, April Term, 1927
Jun 6, 1927
137 A. 915 (Conn. 1927)
Case details for

Hill v. Edwards

Case Details

Full title:EBENEZER HILL vs. WILLIAM I. EDWARDS. MILDRED OGDEN HILL vs. WILLIAM I…

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut Third Judicial District, Bridgeport, April Term, 1927

Date published: Jun 6, 1927

Citations

137 A. 915 (Conn. 1927)
106 Conn. 729