From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hill v. Davis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Mar 28, 2019
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:18-cv-00287-JB-C (S.D. Ala. Mar. 28, 2019)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:18-cv-00287-JB-C

03-28-2019

DONISHER R. HILL, Plaintiff, v. DON DAVIS, et al., Defendants.


JUDGMENT

In accordance with the order entered on this date, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED Defendants Judge Davis and David Zimmerman's motions to dismiss, (Docs. 8 & 17), are GRANTED IN PART to the extent that this action is dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and DENIED IN PART as to their other arguments, and Defendant Judge Davis's motion for Rule 11 sanctions, (Doc. 32), is GRANTED.

DONE this 28th day of March, 2019.

s/ JEFFREY U. BEAVERSTOCK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Hill v. Davis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Mar 28, 2019
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:18-cv-00287-JB-C (S.D. Ala. Mar. 28, 2019)
Case details for

Hill v. Davis

Case Details

Full title:DONISHER R. HILL, Plaintiff, v. DON DAVIS, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 28, 2019

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:18-cv-00287-JB-C (S.D. Ala. Mar. 28, 2019)

Citing Cases

Lanier v. Lanier

Ms. Sharnese LaNier's allegations do not include any facts indicating a “specific classbased, invidiously…