From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hill v. Curtin

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
May 13, 2014
No. 12-2528 (6th Cir. May. 13, 2014)

Opinion

No. 12-2528

05-13-2014

THOMAS HILL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. CINDI S. CURTIN, WARDEN, Respondent-Appellee.


ORDER

BEFORE: BATCHELDER, Chief Judge; BOGGS, MOORE, COLE, CLAY, GIBBONS, ROGERS, SUTTON, COOK McKEAGUE, GRIFFIN, KETHLEDGE, WHITE, STRANCH, and DONALD, Circuit Judges.

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 35(b) provides as follows:

"The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal."

Accordingly, it is ORDERED, that the previous decision and judgment of this court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

This case will be argued before the en banc court on Wednesday, December 3, 2014. A briefing schedule will follow.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

__________

Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk


Summaries of

Hill v. Curtin

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
May 13, 2014
No. 12-2528 (6th Cir. May. 13, 2014)
Case details for

Hill v. Curtin

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS HILL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. CINDI S. CURTIN, WARDEN…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

Date published: May 13, 2014

Citations

No. 12-2528 (6th Cir. May. 13, 2014)

Citing Cases

Hill v. Curtin

Thereafter, we granted Curtin's petition for rehearing en banc and vacated our order. Hill v. Curtin, No.…