From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hill v. Clovis Police Dep't

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 18, 2012
1:11-cv-1391 AWI SMS (E.D. Cal. Jan. 18, 2012)

Opinion

1:11-cv-1391 AWI SMS

01-18-2012

PRESTON HILL, Plaintiff, v. CLOVIS POLICE DEPARTMENT, MARK BRADFORD (Badge #5465), individually and as an officer of the Clovis Police Department, OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY FRESNO COUNTY, ELIZABETH EGAN, individually and as District Attorney, and ELANA ARON SMITH individually and as Deputy District Attorney, Defendants.


ORDER TAKING MATTERS UNDER SUBMISSION

Currently set for hearing and decision on January 23, 2012, are the Defendants' motions to dismiss. The Court has reviewed Defendants' moving papers and has determined that the motions to dismiss are suitable for decision without oral argument. Local Rule 230.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the previously set hearing date of January 23, 2012, is VACATED, and the parties shall not appear at that time. As of January 23, 2012, the Court will take the Defendants' motions to dismiss under submission and will thereafter issue its decision. IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Hill v. Clovis Police Dep't

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 18, 2012
1:11-cv-1391 AWI SMS (E.D. Cal. Jan. 18, 2012)
Case details for

Hill v. Clovis Police Dep't

Case Details

Full title:PRESTON HILL, Plaintiff, v. CLOVIS POLICE DEPARTMENT, MARK BRADFORD (Badge…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 18, 2012

Citations

1:11-cv-1391 AWI SMS (E.D. Cal. Jan. 18, 2012)