From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hill v. City of Sacramento

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 26, 2022
2:22-cv-01625 DAD AC PS (E.D. Cal. Oct. 26, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cv-01625 DAD AC PS

10-26-2022

ARNITHA HILL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

ALLISON CLAIRE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiffs, who have paid the filing fee, are proceeding in this action pro se. The action was accordingly referred to the undersigned by Local Rule 302(c)(21). On October 7, 2022, defendants filed a motion to dismiss. ECF No. 5. Plaintiffs have not responded to the motion. The court is concerned that plaintiffs have abandoned this case.

Local Rule 230(c) provides that opposition to the granting of a motion must be filed fourteen days after the motion is filed. The Local Rule further provides that “[n]o party will be entitled to be heard in opposition to a motion at oral arguments if written opposition to the motion has not been timely filed by that party.” In addition, Local Rule 230(j) provides that failure to appear may be deemed withdrawal of opposition to the motion or may result in sanctions. Finally, Local Rule 110 provides that failure to comply with the Local Rules “may be grounds for imposition of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the inherent power of the Court.”

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs shall file an opposition - or a Statement of Non-Opposition - to the motion no later than November 2, 2022. Failure to file an opposition will be deemed a statement of non-opposition and shall result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute.


Summaries of

Hill v. City of Sacramento

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 26, 2022
2:22-cv-01625 DAD AC PS (E.D. Cal. Oct. 26, 2022)
Case details for

Hill v. City of Sacramento

Case Details

Full title:ARNITHA HILL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF SACRAMENTO, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Oct 26, 2022

Citations

2:22-cv-01625 DAD AC PS (E.D. Cal. Oct. 26, 2022)