From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hill v. City of Aurora

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Mar 23, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-00010-PAB-KMT (D. Colo. Mar. 23, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-00010-PAB-KMT

03-23-2012

GEORG K. HILL, Plaintiff, v. THE CITY OF AURORA, COLORADO, a municipal corporation, Defendant.


Judge Philip A. Brimmer


(consolidated with 10-cv-01134-PAB-KMT)

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

This administratively closed matter is before the Court on the Stipulation for Dismissal filed in consolidated Civil Action No. 10-cv-01134-PAB-KMT [Docket No. 202 in No. 10-cv-01134-PAB-KMT]. On June 8, 2011, the Court consolidated this action with Civil Action No. 10-cv-01134-PAB-KMT because, in each, plaintiff alleged substantially similar facts against the same defendant. See Docket No. 24. In Civil Action No. 10-cv-01134-PAB-KMT, plaintiff was ordered to "file an amended complaint consolidating the factual allegations and causes of action previously contained in the complaints" from both consolidated cases, see Docket No. 164 in No. 10-cv-01134- PAB-KMT, which plaintiff did. See Docket No. 169 in No. 10-cv-01134-PAB-KMT. In light of the Stipulation filed in Civil Action No. 10-cv-01134-PAB-KMT, it is

ORDERED that this case shall be dismissed with prejudice.

BY THE COURT:

____________

PHILIP A. BRIMMER

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Hill v. City of Aurora

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Mar 23, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-00010-PAB-KMT (D. Colo. Mar. 23, 2012)
Case details for

Hill v. City of Aurora

Case Details

Full title:GEORG K. HILL, Plaintiff, v. THE CITY OF AURORA, COLORADO, a municipal…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Mar 23, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-cv-00010-PAB-KMT (D. Colo. Mar. 23, 2012)