From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hill v. Campbell

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 10, 2023
1:23-cv-01103 JLT EPG (PC) (E.D. Cal. Oct. 10, 2023)

Opinion

1:23-cv-01103 JLT EPG (PC)

10-10-2023

TONY HILL, Plaintiff, v. TAMMY CAMPBELL, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DISMISSING THE ACTION

WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE

TO PAY THE FILING FEE

(DOC. 10)

Previously this Court determined that Plaintiff is subject to the three-strikes bar imposed by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and the allegations in the complaint did not satisfy the “imminent danger of serious physical injury” exception to § 1915(g). (Docs. 7, 10.)

On August 31, 2023, the Court ordered Plaintiff to pay the filing fee in full within 30 days. (Doc. 10.) Plaintiff was also informed that the “failure to timely pay the filing fee in full will result in the dismissal of this case.” (Id. at 2, emphasis in original.) Despite this warning, Plaintiff failed to pay the filing fee. Accordingly, the action cannot proceed before the Court at this time. Based upon the foregoing, the Court ORDERS:

1. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to pay the filing fee.
2. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the pending motions (Docs. 2, 4, 11, 12, 13, 14) and to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hill v. Campbell

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 10, 2023
1:23-cv-01103 JLT EPG (PC) (E.D. Cal. Oct. 10, 2023)
Case details for

Hill v. Campbell

Case Details

Full title:TONY HILL, Plaintiff, v. TAMMY CAMPBELL, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Oct 10, 2023

Citations

1:23-cv-01103 JLT EPG (PC) (E.D. Cal. Oct. 10, 2023)