From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hill v. Brommel

United States District Court, E.D. California, Fresno Division
Aug 1, 2007
1:03-CV-6875 OWW DLB P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 1, 2007)

Opinion

1:03-CV-6875 OWW DLB P.

August 1, 2007


ORDER


On August 1, 2007, Defendants sought leave of the Court for an extension of time to file an answer to Plaintiff's complaint. They further asked that if granted, they be granted an additional 30 days to file their answer.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED. Upon careful examination of the moving documents, the Court finds good cause and grants Defendants' request for an additional 30 days to file their answer.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hill v. Brommel

United States District Court, E.D. California, Fresno Division
Aug 1, 2007
1:03-CV-6875 OWW DLB P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 1, 2007)
Case details for

Hill v. Brommel

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD ROSCOE HILL, Plaintiff, v. M. BROMMEL, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California, Fresno Division

Date published: Aug 1, 2007

Citations

1:03-CV-6875 OWW DLB P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 1, 2007)