Opinion
2:18-cv-3089 MCE AC P
11-21-2022
CYMEYON HILL, Plaintiff, v. DAVID BAUGHMAN, et al., Defendants.
ORDER
MORRISON C. ENGLAND SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Plaintiff, a civil detainee proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On September 27, 2022, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 37. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations as well as a motion for reconsideration. ECF Nos. 38, 39. Because the motions were filed the same day,1and because plaintiff's objections filing provides no substantive argument (see generally ECF No. 38) (statement of nonconsent with undersigned's findings and recommendations attached), the Court construes plaintiff's motion for reconsideration as additional objections to the magistrate's findings and recommendations.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The Clerk of Court shall edit docket entry ECF No. 39 to read “Additional Objections to Findings and Recommendations (Motion for Reconsideration)” and remove the gavel icon next to it;
2. The findings and recommendations issued September 27, 2022 (ECF No. 37), are ADOPTED in full;
3. Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction (ECF No. 31) is DENIED, and
4. Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 36) is DENIED as premature.
IT IS SO ORDERED.