From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hill v. Barnhart

United States District Court, Northern District of Florida
Apr 26, 2022
3:22cv3202-MCR-HTC (N.D. Fla. Apr. 26, 2022)

Opinion

3:22cv3202-MCR-HTC

04-26-2022

MICHAEL WAYNE HILL, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL ANDREW BARNHART, MEAGAN RENEE KERNS, Defendants.


ORDER

M. CASEY RODGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation on March 21, 2022. ECF No. 5. The Plaintiff was furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of all timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any timely filed objections thereto, I have determined the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 5) is adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order.

2. Plaintiff's complaint (ECF Doc. 1) is DISMISSED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and as frivolous.

3. The clerk of court is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hill v. Barnhart

United States District Court, Northern District of Florida
Apr 26, 2022
3:22cv3202-MCR-HTC (N.D. Fla. Apr. 26, 2022)
Case details for

Hill v. Barnhart

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL WAYNE HILL, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL ANDREW BARNHART, MEAGAN RENEE…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of Florida

Date published: Apr 26, 2022

Citations

3:22cv3202-MCR-HTC (N.D. Fla. Apr. 26, 2022)