From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hill v. Artus

United States District Court, W.D. New York
Feb 4, 2011
10-CV-558 (W.D.N.Y. Feb. 4, 2011)

Opinion

10-CV-558.

February 4, 2011


ORDER


This case was referred to Magistrate Judge Hugh B. Scott, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A). On July 2, 2010, petitioner filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. On January 13, 2011, Magistrate Judge Scott filed a Report and Recommendation, recommending that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus be denied.

The Court has carefully reviewed the Report and Recommendation, the record in this case, and the pleadings and materials submitted by the parties, and no objections having been timely filed, it is hereby

ORDERED, that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and for the reasons set forth in Magistrate Judge Scott's Report and Recommendation, the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is denied.

The Court finds that petitioner has failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right and therefore denies his motion for a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2).

The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this judgment would not be taken in good faith, and therefore denies leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Further requests to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis must be filed with the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in accordance with the requirements of Rule 24 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

The Clerk of Court shall take all steps necessary to close this case.///sig

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: February 3, 2011


Summaries of

Hill v. Artus

United States District Court, W.D. New York
Feb 4, 2011
10-CV-558 (W.D.N.Y. Feb. 4, 2011)
Case details for

Hill v. Artus

Case Details

Full title:GREGORY HILL, Petitioner, v. DALE A. ARTUS, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, W.D. New York

Date published: Feb 4, 2011

Citations

10-CV-558 (W.D.N.Y. Feb. 4, 2011)