From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hill v. Andron Construction Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 28, 1998
256 A.D.2d 549 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

December 28, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Bernhard, J.).


Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

As the order appealed from does not contain a decretal paragraph granting or denying that branch of the cross motion by the third-party defendant Katonah Roofing, Inc., seeking summary judgment dismissing the claims asserted against it by Andron Construction Corporation, that branch of the cross motion is still pending and undecided ( see, Weitzenberg v. Nassau County Dept. of Recreation Parks, 249 A.D.2d 538; Katz v. Katz, 68 A.D.2d 536). Accordingly, the appeal must be dismissed.

Miller, J. P., Ritter, Sullivan and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hill v. Andron Construction Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 28, 1998
256 A.D.2d 549 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Hill v. Andron Construction Corporation

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE H. HILL et al., Plaintiffs, v. ANDRON CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 28, 1998

Citations

256 A.D.2d 549 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
682 N.Y.S.2d 872

Citing Cases

Pedicini v. Catalano

However, as the order appealed from does not contain a decretal paragraph granting or denying that branch of…

Hussein v. City of New York [2d Dept 1999

The appellants have complied with that order. ORDERED that the appeal from so much of the order as failed to…