From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hill v. Allison

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 9, 2022
2:22-cv-0718-KJM-EFB P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 9, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cv-0718-KJM-EFB P

06-09-2022

CYMEYON V. HILL, Plaintiff, v. KATHLEEN ALLISON, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff, a civil detainee proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On May 12, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed May 12, 2022, are adopted in full;

2. Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied; and

3. Plaintiff shall pay the $402 filing fee within fourteen days from the date of this order. Failure to pay the filing fee as ordered will result in the dismissal of this action.


Summaries of

Hill v. Allison

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 9, 2022
2:22-cv-0718-KJM-EFB P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 9, 2022)
Case details for

Hill v. Allison

Case Details

Full title:CYMEYON V. HILL, Plaintiff, v. KATHLEEN ALLISON, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 9, 2022

Citations

2:22-cv-0718-KJM-EFB P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 9, 2022)