From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hill v. Aggarwal

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 17, 2022
2:22-CV-0571 WBS DMC P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 17, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-CV-0571 WBS DMC P

10-17-2022

CYMEYON HILL, Plaintiff, v. AGGARWAL, Defendant.


ORDER

WILLIAM B. SHUBB UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff has filed a motion to reconsider the court's order adopting the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations, denying plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, dismissing the action without prejudice to refiling upon pre-payment of the filing fees, and denying plaintiff's motion to transfer as moot. (See Docket Nos. 10, 15, 17.) As with his objections to the Findings and Recommendations (Docket Nos. 11, 13), plaintiff's motion to reconsider is unintelligible. More importantly, the court sees no error in its prior order. Accordingly, the motion to reconsider (Docket No. 15) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hill v. Aggarwal

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 17, 2022
2:22-CV-0571 WBS DMC P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 17, 2022)
Case details for

Hill v. Aggarwal

Case Details

Full title:CYMEYON HILL, Plaintiff, v. AGGARWAL, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Oct 17, 2022

Citations

2:22-CV-0571 WBS DMC P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 17, 2022)