From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hill-Colbert v. City of Roseville

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 18, 2022
2:22-cv-01651 WBS DB (E.D. Cal. Oct. 18, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cv-01651 WBS DB

10-18-2022

MARCUS HILL-COLBERT, on behalf of himself and a class of similarly situated persons, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF ROSEVILLE, ROSEVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, TYLER CANTLEY, and DOE 1 to 20, Defendants.


ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS' REQUEST TO SEAL

WILLIAM B. SHUBB UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Defendants have filed a Motion to Seal Exhibit H to the Declaration of Tyler Cantley (Docket No. 5-2) on the ground that it includes the day and month of plaintiff's date of birth. (Docket No. 12.) In order to prevent disclosure of plaintiff's date of birth, however, it is not necessary to seal the entire exhibit. It will suffice to redact only the birthdate itself.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendants' Motion to Seal (Docket No. 12) be, and the same hereby is, DENIED.

AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a redacted version of Exhibit H to the Declaration of Tyler Cantley be substituted for the original version, with plaintiff's birthdate redacted.


Summaries of

Hill-Colbert v. City of Roseville

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 18, 2022
2:22-cv-01651 WBS DB (E.D. Cal. Oct. 18, 2022)
Case details for

Hill-Colbert v. City of Roseville

Case Details

Full title:MARCUS HILL-COLBERT, on behalf of himself and a class of similarly…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Oct 18, 2022

Citations

2:22-cv-01651 WBS DB (E.D. Cal. Oct. 18, 2022)