From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hilario v. Warden, FCI Marianna

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA GAINESVILLE DIVISION
Apr 9, 2013
CASE NO.: 5:13cv24-SPM/GRJ (N.D. Fla. Apr. 9, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO.: 5:13cv24-SPM/GRJ

04-09-2013

JOSE MIGUEL HILARIO, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, FCI MARIANNA, Respondent.


ORDER

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated February 28, 2013. (Doc. 9). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objection timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This case is dismissed. Any pending motions are terminated.

3. The Clerk is directed to close this case.

____________

M. CASEY RODGERS

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Hilario v. Warden, FCI Marianna

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA GAINESVILLE DIVISION
Apr 9, 2013
CASE NO.: 5:13cv24-SPM/GRJ (N.D. Fla. Apr. 9, 2013)
Case details for

Hilario v. Warden, FCI Marianna

Case Details

Full title:JOSE MIGUEL HILARIO, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, FCI MARIANNA, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA GAINESVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Apr 9, 2013

Citations

CASE NO.: 5:13cv24-SPM/GRJ (N.D. Fla. Apr. 9, 2013)