From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hightower v. Patton

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 1, 2011
No. CIV S-08-0228 MCE EFB P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 1, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-08-0228 MCE EFB P.

September 1, 2011


ORDER


Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He has requested that the court appoint counsel. District courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in section 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In exceptional circumstances, the court may request counsel voluntarily to represent such a plaintiff. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1); Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). The court finds that there are no exceptional circumstances in this case.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's August 19, 2011 motion for appointment of counsel is denied.

DATED: August 31, 2011.


Summaries of

Hightower v. Patton

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 1, 2011
No. CIV S-08-0228 MCE EFB P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 1, 2011)
Case details for

Hightower v. Patton

Case Details

Full title:CURTIS HIGHTOWER, Plaintiff, v. W. PATTON, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 1, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-08-0228 MCE EFB P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 1, 2011)