From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hightower v. Kellam

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, San Antonio
Jun 22, 1938
118 S.W.2d 657 (Tex. Civ. App. 1938)

Opinion

No. 10462.

June 22, 1938.

Appeal from One Hundred Seventeenth District Court, Nueces County; Cullen W. Briggs, Judge.

Proceeding by J. E. Hightower against John W. Kellam and others to contest a special election held in the city of Robstown, Tex. From an order sustaining a general demurrer and a special exception to contestant's statement of the grounds of his contest, contestant appeals.

Appeal dismissed.

Frank M. Kemp, J. M. Wilson, and Kleberg, Eckhardt Lowe, all of Corpus Christi, for appellant.

Butler Grimes, of Robstown, for appellees.


This is an appeal from an order of the district court of Nueces County, sustaining a general demurrer and a certain special exception to appellant's statement of the grounds of his contest of a special election held in the City of Robstown, Texas, upon the question of whether or not certain revenue bonds should be issued.

We are confronted, at the threshold of this case, with the fact that the judgment attempted to be appealed from is not a final judgment. Said order reads in part, as follows:

"It is therefore considered by the Court that such demurrer and exception be sustained, and that the defendant recover of the plaintiff the costs, for which he may have his execution; to which ruling of the Court the plaintiff then and there excepted in open court, and gave notice of appeal to the Fourth Court of Civil Appeals of the Supreme Judicial District at San Antonio, Texas."

The mere sustaining of a general demurrer, in the absence of a further order denying the relief sought, or dismissing the case, is not a final judgment, and hence not an appealable order. Secrest v. Ledbetter, Tex. Civ. App. 106 S.W.2d 740; Dixon v. Sanderson, Tex.Sup., 6 S.W. 831; Texas Land Loan Co. v. Winter, 93 Tex. 560, 57 S.W. 39; Kuehn v. Kuehn, Tex.Com.App., 242 S.W. 719; Saffle v. Jones County, Tex. Civ. App. 5 S.W.2d 185; Johnson v. Sunset Stores, Tex. Civ. App. 27 S.W.2d 644, 648; Stratton v. Thompson, Tex. Civ. App. 18 S.W.2d 820; Brock v. Kelley, Tex. Civ. App. 85 S.W.2d 274.

In the absence of a final judgment, this Court is without jurisdiction to hear and determine an appeal. It is, moreover, our duty to dismiss the appeal upon our own motion when the record discloses that we have no jurisdiction. Secrest v. Ledbetter, supra; Kosse National Bank v. Derden, Tex. Civ. App. 36 S.W.2d 295; Dodd v. Daniel, Tex. Civ. App. 89 S.W.2d 494.

It is accordingly ordered that this appeal be, and same is, dismissed.


Summaries of

Hightower v. Kellam

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, San Antonio
Jun 22, 1938
118 S.W.2d 657 (Tex. Civ. App. 1938)
Case details for

Hightower v. Kellam

Case Details

Full title:HIGHTOWER v. KELLAM et al

Court:Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, San Antonio

Date published: Jun 22, 1938

Citations

118 S.W.2d 657 (Tex. Civ. App. 1938)

Citing Cases

Diggs v. Kelly

"The mere sustaining of a general demurrer, in the absence of a further order denying the relief sought, or…