From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hightower v. City of S.F.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 12, 2013
Case No. C 12-5841-EMC (N.D. Cal. Mar. 12, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. C 12-5841-EMC

03-12-2013

MITCH HIGHTOWER, OXANE "GYPSY" TAUB, GEORGE DAVIS, RUSSELL MILLS, and on behalf of all persons similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, DAVID CHIU in his official capacity only as President of the Board of Supervisors of the City and County of San Francisco, SCOTT WIENER in his official capacity only as a member of the Board of Supervisors of the City and County of San Francisco, and ANGELA CALVILLO, in her official capacity only as Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, Defendants.

DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669 City Attorney WAYNE SNODGRASS, State Bar #148137 Deputy City Attorney TARA M. STEELEY, State Bar #231775 Deputy City Attorney Attorneys for Defendants CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, DAVID CHIU, SCOTT WIENER and ANGELA CALVILLO [in their official capacities]


DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669
City Attorney
WAYNE SNODGRASS, State Bar #148137
Deputy City Attorney
TARA M. STEELEY, State Bar #231775
Deputy City Attorney
Attorneys for Defendants
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO,
DAVID CHIU, SCOTT WIENER and ANGELA CALVILLO
[in their official capacities]

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO

CONTINUE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT

CONFERENCE

STIPULATION

Whereas the Court's Order dated January 24, 2013 set the initial Case Management Conference ("CMC") in this action for March 28, 2013;

Whereas the Court's Order dated January 29, 2013 granted the City and County of San Francisco's Motion to Dismiss and gave Plaintiffs forty-five (45) days to file an amended complaint;

Whereas Plaintiffs' amended complaint is due on March 15, 2013;

Whereas the setting of the initial CMC for March 28, 2013 requires the parties to file ADR forms and satisfy the requirements of Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by March 7, 2013;

Whereas the parties are having difficulty satisfying the ADR and Rule 26(f) requirements in good faith because no complaint is currently on file in this action;

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and among Plaintiffs and Defendants, subject to approval of the Court, that:

The Initial Case Management Conference is hereby continued until June 6, 2013, at 9:00 a.m.

SO STIPULATED:

DENNIS J. HERRERA

City Attorney

WAYNE SNODGRASS

TARA M. STEELEY

Deputy City Attorneys

By: _______________

TARA M. STEELEY

Attorneys for Defendants

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, DAVID

CHIU, SCOTT WIENER and ANGELA CALVILLO

[in their official capacities]

CHRISTINA A. DIEDOARDO

Law Offices of Christina DiEdoardo

By: _______________

CHRISTINA A. DIEDOARDO

Attorney for Plaintiffs

MITCH HIGHTOWER, OXANE "GYPSY" TAUB,

GEORGE DAVIS, RUSSELL MILLS, ET AL.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to the Stipulation, the Initial Case Management Conference is hereby continued until June 6, 2013, at 9:00 a.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Judge Edward M. Chen


Summaries of

Hightower v. City of S.F.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 12, 2013
Case No. C 12-5841-EMC (N.D. Cal. Mar. 12, 2013)
Case details for

Hightower v. City of S.F.

Case Details

Full title:MITCH HIGHTOWER, OXANE "GYPSY" TAUB, GEORGE DAVIS, RUSSELL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 12, 2013

Citations

Case No. C 12-5841-EMC (N.D. Cal. Mar. 12, 2013)