finding the shareholder maintained its Section 220 action because it "derived utility from the demand itself as a rhetorical platform" and had all the information it needed for its asserted purpose
Summary of this case from Caspian Select Credit Master Fund Ltd. v. Key Plastics Corp.No. 355, 2006.
April 4, 2007.
Appeal from the Chancery CA 2092.
Decisions without Published Opinions AFFIRMED.
finding the shareholder maintained its Section 220 action because it "derived utility from the demand itself as a rhetorical platform" and had all the information it needed for its asserted purpose
Summary of this case from Caspian Select Credit Master Fund Ltd. v. Key Plastics Corp.Full title:Highland Equity Fund, L.P. v. Motient Corp
Court:Supreme Court of Delaware
Date published: Apr 4, 2007
See Highland Select Equity Fund, L.P. v. Motient Corp., 906 A.2d 156, 157 (Del. Ch. 2006) ("Section 220 is an…
Pettry v. Gilead Scis., Inc.Ch. 2006), and aff'd sub nom. Highland Equity Fund, L.P. v. Motient Corp., 922 A.2d 415 (Del. 2007) ("None of…