From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Highbridge-Woodycrest Ctr. v. Novello

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 8, 2003
304 A.D.2d 363 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

730

April 8, 2003.

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, Bronx County (Kenneth Thompson, J.), entered October 15, 2002, which denied and dismissed the petition to annul respondents' determination to recalculate petitioner's Medicaid reimbursement rate and recoup prior overpayments, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Raul A. Tabora, Jr., for petitioner-appellant.

Carol Fischer, for respondents-respondents.

Before: Tom, J.P., Andrias, Rosenberger, Williams, JJ.


Because the Medicaid overpayments to petitioner were the result of a computational error, and not an error in judgment, respondents' retroactive determination to recoup the overpaid funds was not arbitrary and capricious or otherwise unlawful (see Matter of Westledge Nursing Home v. Axelrod, 68 N.Y.2d 862, 864-865; Matter of Daleview v. Axelrod, 62 N.Y.2d 30). Nor was the challenged administrative determination time-barred since it did not involve a change in established trend factors. The record does not support petitioner's contention that the rates at which petitioner had been reimbursed prior to respondents' recalculation had become final at the time of the disputed action, the audit of petitioner's Medicaid reimbursement rates then still having been ongoing (see Matter of Westledge Nursing Home, 68 N.Y.2d at 864).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Highbridge-Woodycrest Ctr. v. Novello

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 8, 2003
304 A.D.2d 363 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Highbridge-Woodycrest Ctr. v. Novello

Case Details

Full title:HIGHBRIDGE-WOODYCREST CENTER, INC., Petitioner-Appellant, v. ANTONIA C…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 8, 2003

Citations

304 A.D.2d 363 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
757 N.Y.S.2d 289

Citing Cases

Lutheran Med. Cen. v. Daines

As the petitioner did not specifically contend in its petition that the respondents' mistake was an error in…

In the Matter of Jarrett v. Novello

On the other hand, respondent believes that, after having discovered these exclusions during the facility's…