From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

High Schoool Athl. Assoc. v. Martin

Supreme Court of Indiana
Apr 10, 2002
765 N.E.2d 1244 (Ind. 2002)

Opinion

Supreme Court No. 02S05-0106-CV-311. Court of Appeals No. 02A05-0005-CV-178.

April 10, 2002.

APPEAL FROM THE ALLEN COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, The Honorable NANCY ESHCOFF BOYER, Special Judge, Cause No. 02D01-9911-CP-1980.

Robert M. Baker III, Johnson, Smith, Pence, Heath LLP, Indianapolis, IN, Attorney for Appellant.

Edward L. Murphy, Jr., Stefanie R. Crawford, Miller, Carson, Boxberger Murphy LLP, Fort Wayne, IN, Attorneys for Appellee.


ON PETITION TO TRANSFER


This appeal arises from the issuance of a preliminary injunction against the Indiana High School Athletic Association ("IHSAA") and in favor of Jessah Martin ("Martin"). For more background, see our companion decision, Indiana High School Athletic Ass'n, Inc. v. Martin, No. 02S03-0106-CV-312 (Ind. April 10, 2002), also decided today.

On February 8, 2000, Martin filed a Verified Motion for Attorney's Fees in an attempt to recover fees incurred in connection with her earlier Contempt Petition. On February 25, 2000, Martin filed a Verified Supplemental Motion for Attorney's Fees, further requesting an award of fees she incurred in connection with her original fee petition. The trial court conducted a hearing on the fee petitions on March 3, 2000, announcing a judgment for fees incurred in connection with the contempt petition on March 3, 2000.

On January 21, 2000, the trial court found IHSAA in contempt of court and assessed a $500.00 per day fee.

The Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment of the trial court with Judge Vaidik dissenting. See Indiana High School Athletic Ass'n, Inc. v. Martin, 741 N.E.2d 775 (Ind.Ct.App. 2000),transf. granted, 753 N.E.2d 18 (Ind. 2001) (table).

In their submissions to this court, both parties assume Martin's entitlement to attorney fees to be conditioned on the validity of the trial court's contempt finding. Because we hold that the trial court erred in holding the IHSAA in contempt in the companion case decided today, the trial court erred in awarding Martin attorney fees.

Having granted transfer pursuant to Indiana Appellate Procedure Rule 58 (A), thereby vacating the opinion of the Court of Appeals, we now reverse and vacate the trial court's order awarding Martin attorney fees.

SHEPARD, C.J., and DICKSON, BOEHM, and RUCKER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

High Schoool Athl. Assoc. v. Martin

Supreme Court of Indiana
Apr 10, 2002
765 N.E.2d 1244 (Ind. 2002)
Case details for

High Schoool Athl. Assoc. v. Martin

Case Details

Full title:INDIANA HIGH SCHOOL ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellant (Defendant…

Court:Supreme Court of Indiana

Date published: Apr 10, 2002

Citations

765 N.E.2d 1244 (Ind. 2002)