From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

High Country Paving, Inc. v. U.S. Dist. Court (In re High Country Paving, Inc.)

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Nov 14, 2019
No. 19-72853 (9th Cir. Nov. 14, 2019)

Opinion

No. 19-72853

11-14-2019

In re: HIGH COUNTRY PAVING, INC. HIGH COUNTRY PAVING, INC., Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA, MISSOULA, Respondent, UNITED FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY, Real Party in Interest.


D.C. No. 9:18-cv-00163-DWM
District of Montana, Missoula ORDER Before: BYBEE and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner's emergency motion to stay the district court's November 4, 2019 order (Docket Entry No. 3) is granted. See Hilton v. Braunskill, 481 U.S. 770, 776 (1987).

This petition for a writ of mandamus raises issues that warrant an answer. See Fed. R. App. P. 21(b). Accordingly, within 14 days after the date of this order, the real party in interest shall file an answer.

The district court, within 14 days after the date of this order, may address the petition if it so desires. The district court may elect to file an answer with this court or to issue an order and serve a copy on this court. Petitioner may file a reply within 5 days after service of the answer(s). The petition, answer(s), and any reply shall be referred to the next available merits panel.

The Clerk shall serve this order on the district court and District Judge Donald W. Molloy.


Summaries of

High Country Paving, Inc. v. U.S. Dist. Court (In re High Country Paving, Inc.)

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Nov 14, 2019
No. 19-72853 (9th Cir. Nov. 14, 2019)
Case details for

High Country Paving, Inc. v. U.S. Dist. Court (In re High Country Paving, Inc.)

Case Details

Full title:In re: HIGH COUNTRY PAVING, INC. HIGH COUNTRY PAVING, INC., Petitioner, v…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Nov 14, 2019

Citations

No. 19-72853 (9th Cir. Nov. 14, 2019)