From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Higgins v. United States

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Jun 7, 2024
6:23-cv-138-RBD-DCI (M.D. Fla. Jun. 7, 2024)

Opinion

6:23-cv-138-RBD-DCI

06-07-2024

JORENY HIGGINS, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant.


ORDER

ROY B. DALTON, JR., United States District Judge

Before the Court is Plaintiff's Amended Unopposed Motion to Approve the Settlement of Minor, TTP. (Doc. 26 (“Motion”).) On referral, U.S. Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick entered a Report and Recommendation stating that the Court should grant the Motion. (Doc. 27 (“R&R”).) The parties did not object and the time has passed, so the Court examines the R&R for clear error only. See Macort v. Prem, Inc., 208 Fed.Appx. 781, 784 (11th Cir. 2006). Finding none, the R&R is due to be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The R&R (Doc. 27) is ADOPTED AND CONFIRMED and made a part of this Order in its entirety.
2. The Motion (Doc. 26) is GRANTED.
3. The Settlement (Doc. 26-1) is APPROVED.
4. This case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
5. The Clerk is DIRECTED to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Higgins v. United States

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Jun 7, 2024
6:23-cv-138-RBD-DCI (M.D. Fla. Jun. 7, 2024)
Case details for

Higgins v. United States

Case Details

Full title:JORENY HIGGINS, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Florida

Date published: Jun 7, 2024

Citations

6:23-cv-138-RBD-DCI (M.D. Fla. Jun. 7, 2024)