From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Higgins v. Samisch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1920
193 App. Div. 882 (N.Y. App. Div. 1920)

Opinion

June, 1920.


The broad denial in her complaint of the truth of the matters stated in the alleged libel did not prevent plaintiff as the wife of David H. Higgins from availing herself of the statutory right to allege generally that the libel was written and published of and concerning the plaintiff (Code Civ. Proc. § 535), also that plaintiff is one of the persons therein intended to be referred to. The order overruling defendants' demurrer is, therefore, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Jenks, P.J., Mills, Putnam, Kelly and Jaycox, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Higgins v. Samisch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1920
193 App. Div. 882 (N.Y. App. Div. 1920)
Case details for

Higgins v. Samisch

Case Details

Full title:AUGUSTA A. HIGGINS, Respondent, v. ALBERT SAMISCH, Appellant, Impleaded…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 1, 1920

Citations

193 App. Div. 882 (N.Y. App. Div. 1920)