From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Higgins v. County of Cattaraugus

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 5, 1990
166 A.D.2d 923 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

October 5, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Cattaraugus County, Horey, J.

Present — Callahan, J.P., Doerr, Denman, Green and Balio, JJ.


Appeal unanimously dismissed without costs as moot. Memorandum: In these appeals Cattaraugus County and related respondents challenge Supreme Court's rulings that the county was required by article 12 of the Correction Law to establish a local conditional release commission to determine whether petitioners Higgins and Seaver were entitled to be released from the Cattaraugus County Jail. Subsequent to filing these appeals, the County Legislature implemented a conditional release program. On June 20, 1990 the commission denied petitioner Higgins' application for release and on July 3, 1990 he was recommitted to the jail to resume service of his sentence. The record does not reveal whether petitioner Seaver has applied for conditional release but he has the opportunity to do so, which is the principal relief he requested in his petition. Accordingly, these appeals are moot.


Summaries of

Higgins v. County of Cattaraugus

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 5, 1990
166 A.D.2d 923 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

Higgins v. County of Cattaraugus

Case Details

Full title:FRANK W. HIGGINS, III, Respondent, v. COUNTY OF CATTARAUGUS et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Oct 5, 1990

Citations

166 A.D.2d 923 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
561 N.Y.S.2d 685

Citing Cases

Seaver v. Cattaraugus County

Present — Callahan, J.P., Doerr, Denman, Green and Balio, JJ. Appeal unanimously dismissed without costs as…

Matter of Higgins v. Sheriff of Cattaraugus

Present — Callahan, J.P., Doerr, Denman, Green and Balio, JJ. Appeal unanimously dismissed without costs as…