From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Higgins v. Brusco Tug Barge, Inc.

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 3, 2010
NO. CIV. 2:08-2300 WBS KJM (E.D. Cal. Nov. 3, 2010)

Opinion

NO. CIV. 2:08-2300 WBS KJM.

November 3, 2010


ORDER


The court having considered defendants' objections to the Final Pretrial Order, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff shall file an amended pretrial statement in compliance with Local Rule 281(b)(10) within ten days by disclosing current addresses for witnesses Pam Barber, Dennis Barber, Randi Johnson, Traci Johnson, John Lucas, and Larry Hamilton.

DATED: November 3, 2010


Summaries of

Higgins v. Brusco Tug Barge, Inc.

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 3, 2010
NO. CIV. 2:08-2300 WBS KJM (E.D. Cal. Nov. 3, 2010)
Case details for

Higgins v. Brusco Tug Barge, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JOHN D. HIGGINS, JR, Plaintiff, v. BRUSCO TUG AND BARGE, INC., A…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Nov 3, 2010

Citations

NO. CIV. 2:08-2300 WBS KJM (E.D. Cal. Nov. 3, 2010)