From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Higgins v. Bank of Am., N.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
May 31, 2013
No. 3:12-cv-5297-N-BN (N.D. Tex. May. 31, 2013)

Opinion

No. 3:12-cv-5297-N-BN

05-31-2013

TUNYA HIGGINS, Plaintiff, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., ET AL., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND

RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After making an independent review of the pleadings, files, and records in this case, and the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge dated April 26, 2013, the Court finds that the Findings Conclusions, and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the Court.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge are accepted.

____________________

DAVID C. GODBEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Higgins v. Bank of Am., N.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
May 31, 2013
No. 3:12-cv-5297-N-BN (N.D. Tex. May. 31, 2013)
Case details for

Higgins v. Bank of Am., N.A.

Case Details

Full title:TUNYA HIGGINS, Plaintiff, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., ET AL., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: May 31, 2013

Citations

No. 3:12-cv-5297-N-BN (N.D. Tex. May. 31, 2013)

Citing Cases

Olmstead v. Hoppe

A challenge to personal jurisdiction is a defense remedy available to a defendant, not a plaintiff. See…

Johns v. Chase Home Fin.

Accordingly, the statute does not apply to loan modification agreements. See Higgins v. Bank of Am., N.A.,…